linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6599ad830703121925p7049db95nccedfc32609e6ae6@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:25:48 -0700
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>, "Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, matthltc@...ibm.com,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	winget@...gle.com, xemul@...ru
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

On 3/12/07, Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at> wrote:
>
> why? you simply enter that specific space and
> use the existing mechanisms (netlink, proc, whatever)
> to retrieve the information with _existing_ tools,

That's assuming that you're using network namespace virtualization,
with each group of tasks in a separate namespace. What if you don't
want the virtualization overhead, just the accounting?

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/