Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:57:06 +0100
From:	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	matthltc@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, winget@...gle.com, xemul@...ru
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 07:25:48PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at> wrote:
> >
> > why? you simply enter that specific space and
> > use the existing mechanisms (netlink, proc, whatever)
> > to retrieve the information with _existing_ tools,
> 
> That's assuming that you're using network namespace virtualization,

or isolation :)

> with each group of tasks in a separate namespace. 

correct ...

> What if you don't want the virtualization overhead, just the
> accounting?

there should be no 'virtualization' overhead, and what
do you want to account for, if not by a group of tasks?

maybe I'm missing the grouping condition here, but I
assume you assign tasks to the accounting containers

note: network isolation is not supposed to add overhead
compared to the host system (at least not measureable
overhead)

best,
Herbert

> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@...ts.osdl.org
> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists