linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Introduce load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45F6DFEF.2090008@goop.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:31:27 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce load_TLS to the "for" loop.

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:39:36PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
>   
>> GCC (4.1 at least) unrolls it anyway, but I can't believe this code
>>     
>
> Are you sure? Normally it doesn't unroll without -funroll-loops which
> the kernel does normally not set. Especially not with -Os builds.
>   

Does it matter either way in this case?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/