| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <45F6F84D.20302@free.fr> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:15:25 +0100 From: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@...e.fr> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org CC: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@...l.net> Subject: copy_one_pte() I had a look at copy_one_pte(). I cannot see any ioproc_update_page() call, not even for the COW pages. Is it intentional? We can live with a COW page for a considerably long time. How could the IO-PROC. know that a process-ID / user virt. addr. pair refers to the same page? The comment above ioproc_update_page() says that every time when a PTE is created / modified... Thanks, Zoltan Menyhart - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists