linux-kernel - Re: [QUICKLIST 0/4] Arch independent quicklists V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45F7194B.5080705@goop.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:36:11 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, clameter@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [QUICKLIST 0/4] Arch independent quicklists V2

Matt Mackall wrote:
> Well you -could- do this:
>
> - reuse a long in struct page as a used map that divides the page up
>   into 32 or 64 segments
> - every time you set a PTE, set the corresponding bit in the mask
> - when we zap, only visit the regions set in the mask
>
> Thus, you avoid visiting most of a PMD page in the sparse case,
> assuming PTEs aren't evenly spread across the PMD.
>
> This might not even be too horrible as the appropriate struct page
> should be in cache with the appropriate bits of the mm already locked,
> etc.
>   

And do the same in pte pages for actual mapped pages?  Or do you think
they would be too densely populated for it to be worthwhile?

    J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/