linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: stop using kmalloc in xfs_buf_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73E41C01F3C8F79AD31CEDAF@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:08:29 +1100
From:	Timothy Shimmin <tes@....com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	ecashin@...aid.com, akpm@...l.org
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: stop using kmalloc in xfs_buf_get_noaddr

Hi,

--On 9 March 2007 12:55:11 PM +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:

> Ed Cashin found a bug in the error handling code for the case where
> a page allocation fails.  Here's the updated version:
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c	2007-03-08 19:08:38.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c	2007-03-09 08:59:15.000000000 +0100
....
> +	for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++) {
> +		bp->b_pages[i] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!bp->b_pages[i])
> +			goto fail_free_mem;
> +	}
> +	bp->b_flags |= _XBF_PAGES;
> +
> +	error = _xfs_buf_map_pages(bp, XBF_MAPPED);
> +	if (unlikely(error)) {
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: failed to map pages\n",
> +				__FUNCTION__);
>  		goto fail_free_mem;
> -	bp->b_flags |= _XBF_KMEM_ALLOC;
> +	}
>
>  	xfs_buf_unlock(bp);
>
>  	XB_TRACE(bp, "no_daddr", data);
>  	return bp;
> +
>   fail_free_mem:
> -	kmem_free(data, malloc_len);
> + 	for ( ; i >= 0; i--)
> +		__free_page(bp->b_pages[i]);
>   fail_free_buf:
>  	xfs_buf_free(bp);
>   fail:

It looks like you might need: for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
(or: for (j = 0; j < i; j++) etc.)

Because if the initial alloc_page loop goes to completion then:
  i == pagecount
and if alloc_page loop terminates early then
  bp->b_pages[i] == NULL
So we have gone 1 too far in both cases and need to
start free'ing back one.
Unless I missed something.

--Tim



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/