[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070314124906.GA11966@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:49:07 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/59] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> We've started to notice that the i386 build gets broken now that most
> developers tend to have newer CPU's and run mostly on x86-64 (and yes,
> that's me too), and while I don't think unifying things will guarantee
> that doesn't happen in the future, it will hopefully at least help
> make it not get much *worse*.
actually, even for 'cutting edge' testers, the number of 32-bit x86
systems outnumber the number of 64-bit test-systems by a factor of 5.
For distributions with real users, the ratio is closer to 1:10...
so i typically get bugs reported on 32-bit first, and for 64-bit it is
usually only reported if the bug is 64-bit /only/. That basic property
is true for both upstream, -rt and rawhide kernels.
Andi's x86 merge tree /does/ break quite often on 32-bit, but that's not
really due to testers, that's due to Andi being primarily the 64-bit
maintainer ;)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists