[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070314132405.GA14500@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:24:07 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Johann Borck <johann.borck@...sedata.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: considering kevent - the kernel development process
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Johann Borck (johann.borck@...sedata.com) wrote:
> So my questions are:
>
> What in general is wrong with kevent?
>
> What, in detail is wrong with kevent / its proposed interface?
>
> What features are missing?
>
> What are the (real) reasons for the way it is discussed?
Fsck it, Johann :)
It is a trend (a politics) to hide head into the sand and feel like
nothing happend - open source does not have mechanisms to force people
to do something (like comment on foreign ideas/implementations),
so people make a look like problem does not exist and solve it using own way.
There will be tons of other interesting stuff, stay tuned :)
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists