[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173888673.3101.12.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:11:13 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Stolen and degraded time and schedulers
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 23:52 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >
> > That's true, but given a constant clock (like what sched_clock should
> > have) then the accounting is similarly inaccurate. Any connection
> > between the scheduler and the TSC frequency changes aren't part of the
> > design AFAIK ..
> >
>
> Well, my whole argument is that sched_clock /should not/ be a constant
> clock. And I'm not quite sure why you keep bringing up the tsc, because
> it has no relevance.
Then your direction is wrong, sched_clock() should be constant ideally
(1millisecond should really be 1millisecond). Like I said in the last
email, change the scheduler to make it aware of the variable quantum
values.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists