[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703140950090.9690@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 -
Take 2
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> >Seems appropriate, but I really don't care what it's called. One thing about
> >this name, is that typing arch/x86<Tab> doesn't tab complete x86_64 anymore.
> >But if you can think of something better, I'd be happy to apply it.
>
> 80x86
> 8086
> ia32 <- I'd go with this for lack of more entries on this list.
But the whole point is that this is *not* a 32-bit file.
It's a file *shared* between 32-bit and 64-bit kernels.
Which is why plain "x86" is the right name. Yeah, Intel calls it "IA"
these days, but that's just crazy speak (and probably a combination of a
reaction against "amd64" and a way to hide the embarrassment that is
"ia64" by confusing the naming so much that one day people won't remember
that there was _another_ IA that was a total failure).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists