[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070314175936.GM4095@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:59:36 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] fix ps3fb glue allowing a modular build
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:30:31AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Nope. How can kconfig distinguish that from a boolean option in modular
> > driver? bool *can* depend on tristate and be selected when tristate is
> > set to m.
>
> Btw, this is one of those things that easily causes problems.
>
> In many ways it would be nice if we had two different kinds of "bool": one
> where "m" in the dependency chain means "y" is ok, and one where "m" means
> "n".
*nod*
> Maybe not "bool" vs "mbool", but it might be nice to have
>
> bool FB_PS3
> depends strictly on FB
>
> ie a "depends strictly" refuses to upgrade a bool dependency from "m" to
> "y", while a regular depends allows it.
>
> Or something.. The "depends strictly on X" thing would really be just a
> mental shorthand for "depends on (X)=y" (it's actually longer to type, but
> I think it's a bit more intuitive, thus "mental shortcut").
There's a fun side question, though: what should allmodconfig do? FB=m,
FB_PS3=n? Or FB=y, FB_PS3=y?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists