[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070314184744.GA376@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:47:44 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:36:35AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 14:05 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > The thing is others and I (and you) are working on getting paravirt_ops
> > > working for x86_64. There's a lot of overlap between i386 and x86_64.
> > > Right now the i386 is ahead of x86_64 and the code seems to be put more
> > > in the arch/i386 arch. So now we are going to introduce a
> > > new ../../i386 hack to get to a shared paravirt_shared.c(?). Or do we
> >
> > What would you like exactly to share?
>
> I'm still working on that. Others have pressured us into consolidating
> as much usable code for i386 into x86_64. This may turn out not to be
> too feasible anyway.
Only do it where it makes sense and is not too intrusive.
Redoing the whole port just for lguest64 is probably not a good idea.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists