[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070314200704.GB376@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:07:04 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2
> the x86_64 and i386 trees have diverged quite a bit though, so this will
> be a major logistical undertaking. And with Andi opposed to
> fundamentally it it also lacks a bit of manpower i guess :-/
I'm not fundamentally opposed, just sceptical on the effort:gain ratio.
> Andrew's laptop only half a dozen times! ;) But .. in the long run, it's
> alot easier to think about unified code. 32-bit x86 will certainly stay
> with us for at least 10-20 years, and the best model for maintainance is
> having one codebase.
Not sure -- i'm often glad I don't have to care about all the old 32bit
systems on x86-64. I have no problem with modern 32bit x86 systems,
but old x86 tends to be very different from new x86. And all the old erratas
are scary.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists