[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0703142233330.1199@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:34:34 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 -
Take 2
On Mar 14 2007 21:21, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> also, having the x32_ and x64_ prefix is a painful daily reminder for
>> all of us changing the architecture that 'this stuff needs to be
>> unified!'.
>
>We would probably stuck with that forever and it just looks ugly.
>Non paravirt xen uses such a setup and I always hated it.
>
>Besides the architecture is called x86_64
If you don't like x{32,64}_ suffixes, _{32,64} suffixes would also be a
possibility. powerpc/mm/init_32.c for example does it that way.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists