[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F8825F.3030904@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:16:47 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
mlord@...ox.com, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] PCI prepare/activate instead of enable to avoid IRQ
storm and rogue DMA access
Russell King wrote:
> In any case, relying on such a new control bit to implement this kind
> of functionality would result in a very hit and miss result; Linux
How does Tejun's patch or thesis rely on this new control bit? He
explicitly mentions DISABLE_INTX variability...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists