[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173855267.19022.22.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:54:26 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86 boot, pda and gdt cleanups
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 21:39 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > This is called "pissing in the corners". Don't do it: we don't need to
> > touch that code and I actually prefer the original anyway (explicit is
> > *good*).
> >
> > The habit of extracting cpu number once then using it is an optimization
> > which we should be aiming to get rid of (it simply hurts archs with
> > efficient per-cpu implementations).
>
> No, that was for a reason. I was worried about smp_processor_id() not
> returning valid values between init_gdt and cpu_set_gdt. It's not
> actually a problem, but relying on smp_processor_id() while we're moving
> the foundations its based on seems fragile.
smp_processor_id() always works, so it's fundamental, not fragile.
However, we *should* remove the arg from cpu_set_gdt, since we have such
faith in smp_processor_id() 8)
Cheers,
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists