| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070315132717.GB26862@khazad-dum.debian.net> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:27:17 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br> To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, ibm-acpi@....eng.br, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI_IBM_BAY can not coexist with ACPI_BAY On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > ACPI_IBM_BAY cannot coexist with ACPI_BAY --- it causes the IBM ACPI > code to fail to initialize so all the IBM ACPI functionality is > missing. The simplest fix is to just make sure the Kconfig magic > disallows ACPI_IBM_BAY when ACPI_BAY is enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org> I'd really like to know why the two can't coexist, first. And I'd really prefer a patch that make the two load and run with bay functionality concurrently. ACPI_BAY doesn't work right with bay batteries, and I didn't find a way to fix that yet (or I'd have sent in patches). Otherwise, please change the patch to a "depends on ACPI_BAY=n || ACPI_BAY=m". -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists