[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070315163227.230774da@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:32:27 +0100
From:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
	Maneesh Soni <maneesh@...ibm.com>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc suspend regression: sysfs deadlock
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:27:19 -0400 (EDT),
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Fair enough.  One use of "delay" is in a comment you wrote; I'll change it 
> as well.
Fine with me.
> Would people be happier with sysfs_schedule_callback() and
> device_schedule_callback()?  At least the functions do take a callback 
> pointer as an argument, even though they aren't callbacks themselves.
Count one happy person here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists