[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703150858040.3816@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 -
Take 2
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Martin Bligh wrote:
>
> Can't we move the shared files into a new shared arch/ subdirectory
> (ia32_64 or whatever), and have them included from both places?
That's *exactly* what the patches do (except it's called "arch/x86", which
is clearly the best option - please don't use "ia" _anywhere_ except for
"ia64", since that's the only architecture that is really "intel
architecture").
> On the downside, it's more ../../.. type stuff. On the upside,
> they're more cleanly separated and it's apparent what's going on.
> Seems nicer to me than drivers/ and kernel/ for stuff that's
> really arch specific, but shared between two arches.
Absolutely. I'm agreeing violently. I just suspect not a lot of people
really looked at the patches..
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists