linux-kernel - Re: NPTL patch for linux 2.4.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:58:39 +0530
From:	"Syed Ahemed" <kingkhan@...il.com>
To:	"Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>
Cc:	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, msnyder@...hat.com,
	jjohnstn@...hat.com
Subject: Re: NPTL patch for linux 2.4.28

Point taken Sir , Change to 2.6 is inevitable i believe ....Allthough
i shall give the RHEL patch port to 2.4.28 a try over the weekend :-)
Thanks  a lot Willy and Peter for the help .

On 3/15/07, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:53:06AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 03:14 +0530, Syed Ahemed wrote:
> >
> > > Getting RHEL's source ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/21/380 ) was an
> > > idea i thought about but then a download of the RHEL source from the
> > > following location was denied .
> > > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/1/SRPMS/  and
> > > the rpmfind site.
> > > (Guess need to be a paid subscriber for that right ?)
> >
> > Strangely enough you try to download Fedora Core SRPMs whilst you speak
> > of RHEL. Try this one:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/3/en/os/i386/SRPMS/kernel-2.4.21-4.EL.src.rpm
> >
> > Also, CentOS would have similar sources. Google could have informed you
> > on that.
> >
> > > I still wonder why there aren't any NPTL patches available in the
> > > non-redhat sites for kernels like 2.4.21 or more .
> >
> > Because most people, especially the ones on this mailing list have moved
> > on to 2.6 quite some time ago. May I suggest you do the same?
>
> ... or they stick to 2.4 for specific uses and do not need NPTL at all, which
> came late in the development cycle.
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>
>


-- 
Azhar khan

I'm afraid that I've seen too many people fix bugs by looking at
debugger output, and that almost inevitably leads to fixing the
symptoms rather than the underlying problems.
	
--Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/