[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070315174654.GB12447@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:46:54 -0700
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.30 cpu scheduler for mainline kernels
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:05:13PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2007 13:31, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > Just to see the % increase in number of context switches, I ran 8 infinite
> > loops (simple while(1); 's) and with 2.6.21-rc3 I see ~70 context switches
> > every second, whereas with RSDL I see ~530 context switches.
>
> Thanks. If it's just that then scaling rr interval with cpus somewhat would
> help. If you could, the following patch just to test might confirm that.
> -#define RR_INTERVAL ((6 * HZ / 1001) + 1)
> +#define RR_INTERVAL ((12 * HZ / 1001) + 1)
Context switches now are ~370 per second. Still much above the regular ~70
we see in the mainline.
why do you say the rr_interval needs to be scaled with cpus? The basic point
in RSDL is, if we have more than one same priority task on a single logic
cpu, context switch happens every RR_INTERVAL (6 or 12 msec) whereas in
mainline it happens every 100 msec.
We need to minimize these context switches.
thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists