[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070315110752.f1df4509.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:07:52 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pierre.Peiffer@...l.net
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, drepper@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jean-pierre.dion@...l.net, pierre.peiffer@...l.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 4/4] sys_futex64 : allows 64bit futexes
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:52:07 +0100 Pierre.Peiffer@...l.net wrote:
> This last patch is an adaptation of the sys_futex64 syscall provided in -rt
> patch (originally written by Ingo). It allows the use of 64bit futex.
>
> I have re-worked most of the code to avoid the duplication of the code.
>
> It does not provide the functionality for all architectures (only for x64 for now).
What a lot of code.
Why do we want 64-bit futexes?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists