linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: ibm-acpi: allow module to load when acpi notifiers can't be set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:17:21 -0700
From:	Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	kristen.c.accardi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: ibm-acpi: allow module to load when acpi notifiers can't be set

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:51:14PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

> This patch allows for ibm-acpi to coexist (with diminished
> functionality) with other drivers like ACPI_BAY.

Given the ACP_IBM_BAY implementation is more complete (or seems to be,
please comment if that isn't the case) we should probably actually
make sure that is the *preferred* code used (on suitable hardware) at
run time surely?

That way distributions can build both options and on IBM/Lenovo
hardware it will use the IBM ACPI code and otherwise will use the
generic ACPI BAY code?

Perhaps the IBM_ACPI_BAY code should go away and any missing
functionality provided there should be merged into ACPI_BAY?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/