lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F9A063.9040205@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:37:07 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Pierre.Peiffer@...l.net, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jean-pierre.dion@...l.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 4/4] sys_futex64 : allows 64bit futexes

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well OK.  But that doesn't actually explain why 64-bit mutexes are needed.
> It just says they are required.

I can show you the code but it's not easy to understand.  For
complicated syn objects like rwlocks the state information is more than
just locked or not.  Currently we have to use internal locks, modify the
state information, and then release it.  This is terribly inefficient
when many threads are used.  With 64bit futexes the state information
can be kept in the futex object and we don't need an internal lock,
hence the speed-up.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (252 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ