[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F8B1FE.5060406@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:39:58 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: gregkh@...e.de, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
mlord@...ox.com, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] PCI prepare/activate instead of enable to avoid IRQ
storm and rogue DMA access
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> writes:
>> Let's assume there's a device which shares its INTX IRQ line with
>> another device and the other one is already initialized. During boot,
>> due to BIOS's fault, bad hardware design or sheer bad luck, the device
>> has got a pending IRQ.
>
> This seems to be also common after kexec during kexec crashdumps
> where the device just continues doing what it did before the crash.
>
>> This patch expands the pci_set_master() approach. Instead of enabling
>> the device in one go, it's done in two steps - prepare and activate.
>> 'prepare' enables access to PCI configuration,
>
> I hope there aren't any new erratas triggered by this. Perhaps it would
> make sense to add some paranoia sleeps at least before touching other
> state?
Do you mean between disabling IRQ mechanisms and enabling PCI device in
pcim_prepare_device()?
Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists