[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703151324150.27311@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-mm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [QUICKLIST 0/4] Arch independent quicklists V2
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 1. We need to support other states of pages other than zeroed.
>
> What does this mean?
pgd are not completely zeroed. They contain mappings that are always
present. Thus the state is not a zeroed state.
> > 2. Prezeroing does not make much sense if a large portion of the
> > page is being used. Performance is better if the whole page
> > is zeroed directly before use.Prezeroing only makes sense for sparse
> > allocations like the page table pages.
>
> This is not related to the above discussion.
Really? I definitely see the word prezeroing in the discussion.
> > I already tried that 3 years ago and there was *no* benefit for usual
> > users of the a page allocator. The advantage exists only if a small
> > portion of the page is used. F.e. For one cacheline there was a 4x
> > improvement. See lkml archives for prezeroing.
>
> Unsurprised. Were non-temporal stores tried?
Yes with no material change. The work lead to making ia64 use non
temporal stores for spin unlock but it was not useful for prezeroing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists