[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703152205.54639.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:05:53 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: pavel@....cz, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags
On Thursday, 15 March 2007 20:08, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:19:20 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > +int create_basic_memory_bitmaps(void)
> > +{
> > + struct memory_bitmap *bm1, *bm2;
> > + int error = 0;
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(forbidden_pages_map || free_pages_map);
> > +
> > + bm1 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct memory_bitmap), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (!bm1)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + error = memory_bm_create(bm1, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_COLD, PG_ANY);
> > + if (error)
> > + goto Free_first_object;
> > +
> > + bm2 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct memory_bitmap), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (!bm2)
> > + goto Free_first_bitmap;
> > +
> > + error = memory_bm_create(bm2, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_COLD, PG_ANY);
> > + if (error)
>
> What is the risk that we'll go OOM here? GFP_ATOMIC is rather unreliable.
Well, this can be called after processes (including kswapd) has been frozen.
We can't go to sleep at this point.
> And why _does_ suspend use GFP_ATOMIC all over the place?
Generally, because it cannot sleep.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists