[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070316.023331.59468179.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: jeremy@...p.org, ak@....de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
zach@...are.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 13/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Consistently wrap paravirt ops
callsites to make them patchable
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:24:45 +0100
> ugh. This is beyond ugly! Why dont we just compile two images, one for
> Xen and one for native, do two passes to get those two images and
> 'merge' them into a single vmlinuz (so that we still have a 'single'
> kernel unit to deal with on the distro side). This way we avoid all this
> crazy, limited, fragile patchery business...
Perhaps the problem can be dealt with using ELF relocations.
There is another case, discussed yesterday on netdev, where run-time
resolution of ELF relocations would be useful (for
very-very-very-read-only variables) so if it can solve this problem
too it would be nice to have a generic infrastructure for it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists