lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:31:49 +0000
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@...source.com>
CC:	<virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 21/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Use the hvc
 console infrastructure for Xen console

On 16/3/07 09:58, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

>> These mb()'s are pretty standard for lock-free producer/consumer
>> rings. Write descriptor /then/ write the updated producer. Read the
>> producer /then/ read any descriptors revealed by this new producer
>> value.
> 
> then use rmb()/wmb(). Rarely does a ring protocol truly need mb().

It's needed for writing data /after/ reading the consumer index that shows
you have space to write. Looking through xenbus_comms.c I think all the
barriers are correct except there is a spurious extra mb() in xb_read(),
where there is a later rmb() which is sufficient by itself. All the others
have a purpose.

 -- Keir

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ