[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070316151257.24238f2a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:12:57 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert.xu@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] AF_RXRPC: Add blkcipher accessors for using kernel
data directly [try #2]
> > very odd line split
>
> It's not really odd. The "static" and "inline" don't actually add anything to
> the function template. They're merely scope limiters / optimisation
> controllers, and so make a lot of sense placed on their own line.
As do many things but the goal of the coding style is consistency and
almost all other code doesn't have the static inline wasting an extra
display line.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists