linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/22 take 3] UBI: EBA unit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070316075544.c8c01407.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:55:44 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	dedekind@...radead.org
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haver@...t.ibm.com,
	hch@...radead.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22 take 3] UBI: EBA unit

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:21:08 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:24 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > /me repeats wish that Not Everything Should Be Sent to lkml.  :(
> 
> If you do statement like this, please, provide reasons why you say it
> for these patches and suggest something _constructive_. I do not see any
> point in this vague phrase.

so do you believe that Everything (that is kernel-related) should
be sent to lkml?


> And please, note, I was directed here by David Woodhouse who is MTD
> maintainer because he thinks the patch is large and needs more people to
> look at it, not just him.

As I wrote to Mr. Boyer, that makes sense in this case.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/