[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703161313240.6204@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 -
Take 2
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > x86_64 is going to acquire more functionality that will not be available
> > for i386. We plan f.e. to add virtual memmap support for x86_64. Virtual
>
> What advantage would that have over the current setup?
> We already should handle holes between nodes reasonably efficiently
> and with nonlinear memory even holes inside nodes shouldn't be a problem.
It is primarily a performance improvement since the sparsemem table
lookups would no longer be necessary and it also streamlines other
frequent cacheline uses. These page -> page_struct and vice versa
operations are key to the performance of various subsystem among them
the slab allocator.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists