[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174078066.13341.279.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:47:45 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric RISS <frederic.riss@...il.com>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>, Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 16 March 2007 17:33, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the
> > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning.
> > Oops. I'm a scatter-brain.
> >
> > Anyway, the good news about -rc4 is that there's just lots of random
> > fixes. I'm hoping that we've seriously cut down on the regression list,
> > and I'd ask everybody who is on Adrian's list to please re-verify their
> > regression, and in case it's one of the "patches available" ones but I
> > haven't merged (maybe because it hasn't been sent to me!), make sure I do.
>
> I'm afraid that if CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT or CONFIG_NO_HZ is set, we still have a
> problem with RCU synchronization while nonboot CPUs are being enabled during a
> resume (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/11/144, http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/88).
>
> Can someone who had this problem with -rc3 check if it's present in -rc4?
I finally found a box today, which shows this problem. I'm working on a
fix.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists