[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070316125421.ea2ae3bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:54:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] revoke: core code
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:37:57 +0200 "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> What we could do is add a "I am revoked" flag to struct file which
> blocks any future ->readpage, ->readpages, and ->direct_IO on the
> file. Alternatively, we could change the ->f_mapping to point to an
> address space that has "revoked address space" operations. Hmm.
iirc, that was part of the rationale for the introduction of f_mapping.
I'll cc he-who-never-replies, who did that work.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists