[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703161354520.6204@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: mbligh@...igh.org, andi@...stfloor.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, glommer@...il.com,
apw@...dowen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 -
Take 2
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Please read my posts to linux-mm on that subject. We discussed it last
> > year in detail and the agreement was that the sparsemem crud needs to be
> > taken out. Kame-san posted patches to do that.
>
> Please don't do that, sparsemem works very well on sparc64 and I
> like the flexibility it gives me.
I am not sure what flexibility you are talking about? The modification are
to make sparsemem support virtual memmap as one option. See Kame-san's
posts. There is no regression here its just cutting out the overhead of
sparsmem from within.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists