linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070315192038.82933a2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:20:38 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5

On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:22:45 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> wrote:

> Following this email are three patches which represent the
> current state of the lumpy reclaim patches; collectively lumpy V5.

So where do we stand with this now?    Does it make anything get better?

I (continue to) think that if this is to be truly useful, we need some way
of using it from kswapd to keep a certain minimum number of order-1,
order-2, etc pages in the freelists.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/