[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070316142356.3b9a5597.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:23:56 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>
Cc: vatsa@...ibm.com, menage@...gle.com,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xemul@...ru, ebiederm@...ssion.com, winget@...gle.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Summary of resource management discussion
Herbert wrote:
> looks good to me, except for the potential issue with
> the double indirection introducing too much overhear
It's not the indirection count that I worry about.
It's the scalability of the locking. We must avoid as
much as possible adding any global locks on key code paths.
This means:
1) be reluctant to add them to fork/exit
2) just RCU locks on per-job (or finer grain) data when on
the normal page allocation path
3) nothing outside the current task context for the normal
task scheduling code path.
A global lock on the wrong code path is fatal for scaling
big NUMA boxes.
... now whether or not that is an issue here, I don't claim
to know. I'm just worried that it could be.
Atomic data, such as global counters, is just as bad.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists