[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45FB1288.5080909@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:56:24 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 17/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Add nosegneg capability to the
vsyscall page notes
Roland McGrath wrote:
> This should be:
>
> NOTE_KERNELCAP_BEGIN(1, 1)
> NOTE_KERNELCAP(0, "nosegneg")
> NOTE_KERNELCAP_END
>
> i.e. 1->0 in the "bit" member. (Note the ld.so.conf.d file must have the
> matching bit number for ldconfig-based lookups to do the right thing.)
> Or else:
>
> NOTE_KERNELCAP_BEGIN(1, 2)
> NOTE_KERNELCAP(0, "nosegneg")
> NOTE_KERNELCAP_END
>
> i.e. 1->2 in the "mask" member. (The mask value should be 1<<bit.)
>
Thanks Roland. I've never really understood this stuff, and I just
copied this cargo-cultishly.
I'm not quite sure what you're suggesting here though. Do you mean one of:
NOTE_KERNELCAP_BEGIN(1, 1)
NOTE_KERNELCAP(0, "nosegneg")
NOTE_KERNELCAP_END
or
NOTE_KERNELCAP_BEGIN(1, 2)
NOTE_KERNELCAP(1, "nosegneg")
NOTE_KERNELCAP_END
is the correct thing to use?
> Some pre-release glibc's (before 2.4) had a bug in the code that parses
> this, and would crash parsing the correct note. Using the wrong bit value
> with nonmatching mask worked around this. IIRC, no glibc release ever
> included the buggy version of the code. In nonbuggy glibc, the mismatched
> value causes the "nosegneg" to be omitted from the directory search (under
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH and default directories), though ldconfig-based lookups
> will work (the most common case).
>
Are you saying that one of the corrected forms might cause old glibcs to
crash, or just ignore nosegneg?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists