linux-kernel - Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070317214136.GE4466@mellanox.co.il>
Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:41:36 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

> Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@....mellanox.co.il>:
> Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
> 
> > Quoting Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
> > Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
> > 
> > 
> > Michael,
> > 
> > * Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...lanox.co.il> wrote:
> > 
> > > > > 2. First disk access after resume takes a couple of minutes
> > > > >    (seemed instant with 2.6.20) during this time no new messages show on console
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, there is some problem with SATA resume. It would be beautiful if the 
> > > > people who actually see this could narrow it down with bisection. "It 
> > > > works for me" is clearly the case for many people, but not all.
> > > 
> > > Problem is, there seem to be multiple problems some of which got fixed 
> > > between rc2 and rc3. With rc2 I didn't get as far as getting to 
> > > console.
> > 
> > a quick ping: on your box that doesnt resume - if you can log in over 
> > the network after resume (or somehow run shell commands), does 'date' 
> > advance properly or not? (or do you not get that far to be able to 
> > tell?)
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> 
> I just retested - 'date' does not advance after resume for me.
> This is with NO_HZ *not* set.
> Sorry it took so long.

Update: just re-tested with 2.6.21-rc4, same behaviour: date
does not advance after resume from ram.

-- 
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/