linux-kernel - Re: forced umount?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45FB6E32.3050009@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:27:30 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>
CC:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: forced umount?

Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Is this forced umount work even considered worthwhile by the greater
> Linux community?  Is anyone actively working on this?

Have a look at all the discussion about revoke/frevoke on lkml over the
last week or two.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/