lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:43:16 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:07:14 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op
>>
>> The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
>> Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.
>>
>> This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
>> matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.
>>
>> In order to do this, we:
>>    1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
>>    2. hoist cycles_2_ns into a common header
>>    3. update vmi accordingly
>>
>> One thing to note: because sched_clock is implemented as a weak function in
>> kernel/sched.c, we must define a real function in order to override this weak
>> binding.  This means the usual paravirt_ops technique of using an inline
>> function won't work in this case.
>>     
>
> include/asm/paravirt.h: In function 'paravirt_sched_clock':
> include/asm/paravirt.h:281: warning: implicit declaration of function 'PVOP_CALL0'
> include/asm/paravirt.h:281: error: expected expression before 'unsigned'
>   

Sorry, I didn't intend for it to be picked up; it depends on stuff
earlier in the patch series.  I just wanted to check with the VMI folks
that it works for them in principle.

    J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ