[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070317124458.GA32301@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:44:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: jos poortvliet <jos@...nkamer.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31
* jos poortvliet <jos@...nkamer.nl> wrote:
> Op Saturday 17 March 2007, schreef Ingo Molnar:
> > so it is not at all clear to me that RSDL is indeed an improvement,
> > if it does not have comparable auto-nice properties.
>
> Wasn't the point of RSDL to get rid of the auto-nice, because it
> caused starvation, unpredictable behaviour and other problems?
it doesnt really get rid of it, it replaces it with another mechanism
that is fundamentally unfair too.
RSDL has _another_, albeit more hidden "auto-nice" behavior: this time
expressed not via the plain manipulation of priorities based on the
sleep average, but expressed via the quota-depletion flux of tasks over
time, fed into a complex dance of rotating priorities - which
quota-depletion flux is in essence a sleep average too, just more
derived and more hardcoded.
or looking at it from another angle, code size:
text data bss dec hex filename
15750 24 6008 21782 5516 sched.o.vanilla
15960 360 6336 22656 5880 sched.o.rsdl
there's no reduction in complexity, it just moved elsewhere.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists