[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703170956.13901.edt@aei.ca>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:56:13 -0400
From: Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck@....kolivas.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31
On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:08, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> P.S. "utter failure" was too harsh. What sticks in my craw is that the
> world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler.
If a new scheduler has a better 'normal' performance adjusting to its quirks
is fine. Your testing is important. We need to understand what needs
to be tweaked and why.
>From my POV 0.30 is better than mainline - it handles my load(s) better.
Thanks
Ed Tomlinson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists