[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070317143043.GA8577@osiris.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:30:43 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, suparna@...ibm.com,
cmm@...ibm.com, alex@...sterfs.com, suzuki@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sys_fallocate() system call
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:07:06AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 08:59:05PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > ... but wouldn't work on 32-bit powerpc. :( We would end up with a
> > pad argument between fd and offset, giving 7 arguments in all
> > (counting the loff_t's as 2), but we only support 6.
>
> Ditto mips and parisc.
Can't be. Or: mips supports 7 arguments and parisc doesn't pad.
Otherwise they couldn't have wired up
sys_sync_file_range(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t nbytes, unsigned int flags)
But from what I read, it's currently not possible for 32-bit powerpc to
wire up the already present sync_file_range system call.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists