[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174236579.17249.6.camel@sauron>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:49:39 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frank Haverkamp <haver@...t.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22 take 3] UBI: Unsorted Block Images
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but why did you not implement the two features
> above as device mapper layers instead? A device mapper can arbitrarily
> transform I/O addresses and contents and has direct access to the
> mapped device's ioctl interfaces, etc.
Just because UBI is designed for flash devices, not block devices. Note,
UBI is not for MMC/USB stick/SC/etc flashes, which are used as block
devices, but for _bare_ flashes.
Please, glance here to find more information about the different between
flashes and block devices:
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/general.html#L_mtd_vs_hdd
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists