[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070318202444.GC11078@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:24:44 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>
Subject: Re: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?
> Quoting Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>:
> Subject: Re: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?
>
> Hello!
>
> > Hmm. Something I don't understand: does the code
> > in question not run on *each* device unregister?
>
> It does.
>
>
> > Why do I only see this under stress?
>
> You should have some referenced destination entries to trigger bad path.
> This should happen not only under stress.
>
> F.e. just try to ssh to something via this device. And unregister it.
> Seems, the crash is inevitable. If you do not see crash, I will be puzzled.
I did this.
What happens is:
neigh_setup is called
dst_ifdown changes the neigh->dev to loopback device
But the funny thing is that this neighbour can thinkably hang
around indefinitely now, and if it does destructor won't be called
and there won't be a crash.
To trigger a crash, I did simply
ifconfig lo down; ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
and sure enough it crashes in drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c.
--
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists