[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45FDB4C9.5030103@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:53:13 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Bauer <JohannesBauer@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, schwab@...e.de,
Stable Kernel Team <stable@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: prevent overrun DoS in hrtimer_forward()
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 17:16 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> I'd prefer this one: The maximum seconds value we can handle on 32bit is
>>> LONG_MAX.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ktime.h b/include/linux/ktime.h
>>> index c68c7ac..248305b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/ktime.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/ktime.h
>>> @@ -57,7 +57,11 @@ typedef union {
>>> } ktime_t;
>>>
>>> #define KTIME_MAX ((s64)~((u64)1 << 63))
>>> -#define KTIME_SEC_MAX (KTIME_MAX / NSEC_PER_SEC)
>>> +#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
>>> +# define KTIME_SEC_MAX (KTIME_MAX / NSEC_PER_SEC)
>>> +#else
>>> +# define KTIME_SEC_MAX LONG_MAX
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * ktime_t definitions when using the 64-bit scalar representation:
>>>
>> Just to be clear: this replaces the earlier patch, right?
>
> This replaces the fix Andrew did.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117407812411997&w=2
>
Right, but is the original "Prevent DOS" patch from you still needed?
Or did Andrew's patch replace that one, and now this replaces his?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists