linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/6] fault vs truncate/invalidate race fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:13:37 +1100
From:	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
To:	"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, npiggin@...e.de,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] fault vs truncate/invalidate race fix

> > the new fault hander made the memory manager code a lot cleaner and
> > very less hacky in a lot of cases. so I'd rather merge the clean code
> > than have to fight with the current code...
>
> Note that you can probably get away with NOPFN_REFAULT etc... like I did
> for the SPEs in the meantime.

Indeed, Thomas has done this work and I'm just lining up a TTM tree to
start the merge process..

Dave.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/