[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <45FCCC39.7090104@qumranet.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:20:57 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/15] KVM userspace interface updates
Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:53:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> This patchset updates the kvm userspace interface to what I hope will
>> be the long-term stable interface. Provisions are included for extending
>> the interface later. The patches address performance and cleanliness
>> concerns.
>>
>
> Searching the mailing list I figured that as soons as the interface seems
> to be stable, kvm should/would switch to a system call based interface.
> I assume the userspace interface might still change a lot, especially if
> kvm is ported to new architectures.
> But the general question is: do you still plan to switch to a syscall
> interface?
>
I don't have any present plans for that. Maybe when the interface
starts to evolve at a slower pace, or if it is shown to be significantly
faster.
Not that interface stabilization here doesn't mean a freeze; it means
that backwards compatibility starts when this gets merged.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists