linux-kernel - Re: + remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:50:36 -0700
From:	sukadev@...ibm.com
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch added to -mm tree

Eric W. Biederman [ebiederm@...ssion.com] wrote:
| Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> writes:
| 
| > Yes! I meant we should change INIT_SIGNALS(), currently it does
| >
| > 	#define INIT_SIGNALS(sig) {
| > 		...
| > 		.pgrp           = 1,
| > 		{ .__session      = 1},
| >
| > and this confuses (I think) set_special_pids(1,1) above. Because
| > __set_special_pids() still deals with pid_t, not "struct pid".
| >
| > Unless I missed something, we should kill these 2 initializations
| > above.
| 
| Got it.  I agree we should initialize those fields to 0.
| 
| Sukadev you want to get that?

Sure. Will do that.

Thanks Oleg for your detailed review/comments.

Suka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/